<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATI Catalyst 9.1 vs 9.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ati-catalyst-91-vs-92</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:24:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simonn</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/comment-page-1/#comment-30642</link>
		<dc:creator>Simonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/#comment-30642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, but its a bit long and most people like short and sweet posts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but its a bit long and most people like short and sweet posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vacation Decisions &#124; MEGATechNews :: Mega Techie Goodness For the Masses</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/comment-page-1/#comment-30490</link>
		<dc:creator>Vacation Decisions &#124; MEGATechNews :: Mega Techie Goodness For the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/#comment-30490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] TestFreaks presents ATI Catalyst 9.1 vs 9.2 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TestFreaks presents ATI Catalyst 9.1 vs 9.2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katalyysi</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/comment-page-1/#comment-30451</link>
		<dc:creator>katalyysi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/information/ati-catalyst-91-vs-92/#comment-30451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Overall though we see a decrease in performance when moving from 9.1 to 9.2, not sure why, and not what was listed in the release notes for the drivers.&quot;:  Catalyst 9.2 brings performance benefits in several cases where framerates are CPU-limited. You think Q9650 is &quot;CPU-limited&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Overall though we see a decrease in performance when moving from 9.1 to 9.2, not sure why, and not what was listed in the release notes for the drivers.&#8221;:  Catalyst 9.2 brings performance benefits in several cases where framerates are CPU-limited. You think Q9650 is &#8220;CPU-limited&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
