<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Google Have An Ulterior Motive With The Nexus One?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-ulterior-motive-nexus</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raziel36</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/comment-page-1/#comment-41730</link>
		<dc:creator>Raziel36</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=48062#comment-41730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#039;t needed, if that was their motive, as the Moto Droid and it&#039;s open bootloader did tons more for Android than the N1 did.  Moto stepped up quicker and made a massive impact with the Droid... which is probably the real reason the N1 couldn&#039;t get the footing it needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t needed, if that was their motive, as the Moto Droid and it&#8217;s open bootloader did tons more for Android than the N1 did.  Moto stepped up quicker and made a massive impact with the Droid&#8230; which is probably the real reason the N1 couldn&#8217;t get the footing it needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve St. Germain</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/comment-page-1/#comment-41573</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve St. Germain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=48062#comment-41573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article, I agree w/ the first half more.  The reason N1 didn&#039;t succeed is because they couldn&#039;t get it into any of the big carriers lineup.  Remember when Verizon denied the Nexus over the Incredible?  http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/26/verizon-nexus-one-incredible/ And how about the horrible press it received when brought to AT&amp;T? http://www.physorg.com/news188152934.html

Sprint brought the EVO in this spring, denying Google to carry the device in stores: http://gizmodo.com/5535436/sprint-wont-sell-the-nexus-one

Like you mentioned, they had no local exposure, but I think it was largely due to carriers not giving them the support.  It was like the big guys wanted to show Google who really runs the industry, so they blocked the phone and forced the Nexus to fail. RIP]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, I agree w/ the first half more.  The reason N1 didn&#8217;t succeed is because they couldn&#8217;t get it into any of the big carriers lineup.  Remember when Verizon denied the Nexus over the Incredible?  <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/26/verizon-nexus-one-incredible/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/26/verizon-nexus-one-incredible/</a> And how about the horrible press it received when brought to AT&amp;T? <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news188152934.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news188152934.html</a></p>
<p>Sprint brought the EVO in this spring, denying Google to carry the device in stores: <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5535436/sprint-wont-sell-the-nexus-one" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/5535436/sprint-wont-sell-the-nexus-one</a></p>
<p>Like you mentioned, they had no local exposure, but I think it was largely due to carriers not giving them the support.  It was like the big guys wanted to show Google who really runs the industry, so they blocked the phone and forced the Nexus to fail. RIP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/comment-page-1/#comment-41568</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=48062#comment-41568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting insight. I&#039;ve been dying to get on Android since it seems like my iphone gets slower and slower by the day. I can&#039;t believe all the droid choices available, and I&#039;m excited about cutting the Apple umbilical chord. Ulterior motive or not, it seems to have worked!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insight. I&#8217;ve been dying to get on Android since it seems like my iphone gets slower and slower by the day. I can&#8217;t believe all the droid choices available, and I&#8217;m excited about cutting the Apple umbilical chord. Ulterior motive or not, it seems to have worked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke B</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/comment-page-1/#comment-41563</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=48062#comment-41563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that you are right that Google&#039;s objective wasn&#039;t necessarily to sell as many N1s as possible. I also think it is good insight that they didn&#039;t want to overshadow and alienate their partners.

But I think the N1 was always intended to be a developer phone first and a consumer phone second. They needed a gold standard for developers and a platform to launch the latest and greatest updates on. I think Google didn&#039;t want to put up with manufacturers dragging their feet over updating to the latest version of android. How much press would Froyo get if they released it and no one could use it? It is getting a ton of buzz despite that only 3% of android users can even access it (without using custom roms). I think they would have sold as many phones as there was demand, but I agree that it wasn&#039;t their primary objective.

The phone will remain the best android phone until the next google release, not because of the hardware but because it is google&#039;s platform for releasing updates. Hopefully they will be a bit picker about the hardware when they are picking their next favorite child. I love my N1, but it can be downright fickle about it&#039;s 3g connection and google has admitted that fixing it is not their priority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you are right that Google&#8217;s objective wasn&#8217;t necessarily to sell as many N1s as possible. I also think it is good insight that they didn&#8217;t want to overshadow and alienate their partners.</p>
<p>But I think the N1 was always intended to be a developer phone first and a consumer phone second. They needed a gold standard for developers and a platform to launch the latest and greatest updates on. I think Google didn&#8217;t want to put up with manufacturers dragging their feet over updating to the latest version of android. How much press would Froyo get if they released it and no one could use it? It is getting a ton of buzz despite that only 3% of android users can even access it (without using custom roms). I think they would have sold as many phones as there was demand, but I agree that it wasn&#8217;t their primary objective.</p>
<p>The phone will remain the best android phone until the next google release, not because of the hardware but because it is google&#8217;s platform for releasing updates. Hopefully they will be a bit picker about the hardware when they are picking their next favorite child. I love my N1, but it can be downright fickle about it&#8217;s 3g connection and google has admitted that fixing it is not their priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Nash</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/information/google-ulterior-motive-nexus/comment-page-1/#comment-41556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Nash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 07:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=48062#comment-41556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree. 6 months ago, there was no great Android phone. We now have new killer released every week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. 6 months ago, there was no great Android phone. We now have new killer released every week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
