<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Art Feierman of Projector Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.testfreaks.com/interview/interview-art-feierman-projector-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/interview/interview-art-feierman-projector-reviews/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=interview-art-feierman-projector-reviews</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/interview/interview-art-feierman-projector-reviews/comment-page-1/#comment-26631</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=1774#comment-26631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art, Thanks once again for your time and it&#039;s really interesting stuff to read. I thought I should take a few minutes to respond to a few of the things you bring up about Testfreaks and especially the scoring. You seemed to have stumbled on a bug in our system, we do take into account the age of the product and the age of the reviews but for some reason that part of our FreakScore hasn&#039;t been working properly so we are coming out with a fix shortly. So for those examples you talked about above these should be more accurate numbers.

InFocus IN83: 8.925246
InFocus IN82: 8.272829
InFocus IN81: 7.9094486
InFocus IN76: 7.4153757
InFocus IN72: 7.1041274


Panasonic PT-AE2000: 10.0
Panasonic PT-AE900: 6.8586307

Besides this there are many more things we need to address then just the FreakScore in order to give our users a better overview of the differences between the products. It must be easier to understand how much better the IN83 is compared to the IN82 for example, not only the grades but also in terms of features and the simple fact that the IN83 is a never projector with many differences that makes it stand out from the old generation. In short we are working on it and we always welcome comments and insights that helps us deliver a better user experience. 

We know that our users love reading great reviews such as the reviews provided by Projectorreviews.com and we encourage all users who are looking for new products to read many reviews before they buy something, thats why we are here :). But we also need to give something extra to table, the meta review and meta information about the product and we are adding value today but we have much more to give then whats visible on the site today so in the end the mix between what we offer and what great professional review sites offer is going help users buy the right products.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art, Thanks once again for your time and it&#8217;s really interesting stuff to read. I thought I should take a few minutes to respond to a few of the things you bring up about Testfreaks and especially the scoring. You seemed to have stumbled on a bug in our system, we do take into account the age of the product and the age of the reviews but for some reason that part of our FreakScore hasn&#8217;t been working properly so we are coming out with a fix shortly. So for those examples you talked about above these should be more accurate numbers.</p>
<p>InFocus IN83: 8.925246<br />
InFocus IN82: 8.272829<br />
InFocus IN81: 7.9094486<br />
InFocus IN76: 7.4153757<br />
InFocus IN72: 7.1041274</p>
<p>Panasonic PT-AE2000: 10.0<br />
Panasonic PT-AE900: 6.8586307</p>
<p>Besides this there are many more things we need to address then just the FreakScore in order to give our users a better overview of the differences between the products. It must be easier to understand how much better the IN83 is compared to the IN82 for example, not only the grades but also in terms of features and the simple fact that the IN83 is a never projector with many differences that makes it stand out from the old generation. In short we are working on it and we always welcome comments and insights that helps us deliver a better user experience. </p>
<p>We know that our users love reading great reviews such as the reviews provided by Projectorreviews.com and we encourage all users who are looking for new products to read many reviews before they buy something, thats why we are here <img src='http://blog.testfreaks.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . But we also need to give something extra to table, the meta review and meta information about the product and we are adding value today but we have much more to give then whats visible on the site today so in the end the mix between what we offer and what great professional review sites offer is going help users buy the right products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
