<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Actual Selling Price for Kelkoo Disclosed, Lower than Previously Rumored</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Bits &#38; Some Fine Reads From Around the Web &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/comment-page-1/#comment-28154</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Bits &#38; Some Fine Reads From Around the Web &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=5087#comment-28154</guid>
		<description>[...] may have sold Kelkoo off for $57 million, much less than the $126 million sale previously reported. Damn, they spent $600 million buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have sold Kelkoo off for $57 million, much less than the $126 million sale previously reported. Damn, they spent $600 million buying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/comment-page-1/#comment-28119</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=5087#comment-28119</guid>
		<description>*would guess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*would guess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arvin</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/comment-page-1/#comment-28118</link>
		<dc:creator>Arvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=5087#comment-28118</guid>
		<description>&quot;And not for quick profit&quot;, well with any time preference at all price comparison sites must be accurate to stay profitable. I have no idea on how investment works in the industry, but I will be guess that investors do not go for &quot;pump and dump&quot;? Has there seriously been any &quot;pump and dump&quot; comparison sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And not for quick profit&#8221;, well with any time preference at all price comparison sites must be accurate to stay profitable. I have no idea on how investment works in the industry, but I will be guess that investors do not go for &#8220;pump and dump&#8221;? Has there seriously been any &#8220;pump and dump&#8221; comparison sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Bits &#38; Some Fine Reads From Around the Web - GigaOM</title>
		<link>http://blog.testfreaks.com/news/actual-selling-price-kelkoo-disclosed-previously-rumored/comment-page-1/#comment-28109</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Bits &#38; Some Fine Reads From Around the Web - GigaOM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testfreaks.com/blog/?p=5087#comment-28109</guid>
		<description>[...] may have sold Kelkoo off for $57 million, much less than the $126 million sale previously reported. Damn, they spent $600 million buying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may have sold Kelkoo off for $57 million, much less than the $126 million sale previously reported. Damn, they spent $600 million buying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

